489 IV Re: OT/PT Encouraging Sanity. NO NUKES FOR DICK << Prev Next >>
by: ColonelZen	IP: 46.29	rated: 0-0	posted: 2007-09-08 22:02:24
Msg: 41077 of 41628 9/3/2007 7:45:16 PM Recs: 4 Sentiment: Strong Sell   By: ColonelZen Send PM Profile Ignore Add To Favorites   Posted as a reply to msg 41072 by rfc3501   Re: OT/PT Encouraging Sanity. NO NUKES FOR DICK       Are you too stupid to realize that you're arguing in circles?     Or just hoping that we won't notice?     Here you are specificly contradicting yourself across a single generation of replies:         http://www1.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=1911&pt=msg&mn=41058 replying to my objections to nuking tens/hundreds of thosands of innocents:   ----------------       <<< How much crazier than a (bunch of?) deranged political fanatics in the western hemisphere who want to nuke them, their brothers, cousins, the shopkeeper down the street, the children in the schools and hundreds of thousands of innocents. >>>     What you forgot to mention is that they, their brothers, cousins, and the shopkeeper down the street already declared war against those "political fanatics", and expressed their express and explicit intention to kill them all, all for the offense of not facing Mecca and bumping their head on the floor, five times a day.   ------------------       Then in thread, in subequent derivations of that paragraph:       http://www1.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=1911&mn=41072&pt=msg&mid=2923317   -----------------------   <<< So you assert that there are no innocents? That there are none in Arab nations who want to just live their lives day by day, working, laughing, loving, playing at their various interests? >>>     There certainly are, but they are not Islamic fundamentalists. "Arab nations" are defined geographically. Islamic fundamentalists are not. You are deliberately comparing apples and oranges.   ------------------------     Now the population of innocents vs "combatants" is hardly a strawman when one is trying to disuade a nutcase who is arguing for first use of nuclear weapons.     YOU create the strawman by then conflating your call for first use of nukes with the decisions and policies involved in the prosecution of declared wars by sovereign nations.     Since you are either trolling or stupidly pushing "talking points", Here's a talking point I'd like to give you:     NO NUKES FOR DICK!       -- TWZ