|
| Home | The Boards | Messages | Thread |
|
|||||||
| by: ColonelZen | IP: 150.55 | rated: 0-0 | posted: 2007-09-07 19:08:02 | ||||
|
On Fridays I usually wait until much later to check because the MoFo team in particular has a nasty habit of late filing. But on a hunch I checked early tonight (I'll check back later to see if the MoFo's are doing the moonlight filing as well). ------- Novell http://www.zensden.net/Documents/SCO-v-Novell 453 ORDER granting 385 Motion to Strike ; granting 387 Motion to Dismiss ; finding as moot 389 Motion in Limine; granting 391 Motion in Limine; granting 393 Motion in Limine; denying 395 Motion in Limine; finding as moot in part and denying in part [406] & [408] Sealed Amended Motion in Limine; denying 410 Motion for Entry of Judgment. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 9-7-07. (sih) (Entered: 09/07/2007) means: 385 MOTION to Strike SCO's Jury Demand filed by Defendant Novell, -- granted 387 MOTION to Dismiss Voluntarily Its Third Claim for Relief filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. -- granted 389 Plaintiff's MOTION in Limine to Exclude All Evidence Related to Other Litigation and Commentary Thereon filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. -- moot 391 MOTION in Limine No. 1 to Preclude SCO from Challenging Questions Already Decided as a Matter of Law filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. -- granted 393 MOTION in Limine No. 2 to Preclude SCO from Contesting Licenses Conveying SVRX Rights are "SVRX Licenses" filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. -- granted 395 MOTION in Limine No. 3 to Preclude SCO from Introducing New Evidence or Argument of SCOsource Revenue filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. -- denied 406 **SEALED DOCUMENT** SEALED MOTION in Limine Regarding Apportionment of 2003 Microsoft and Sun Agreements filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. Motions referred to Brooke C. Wells. -- moot+denied 408 **SEALED DOCUMENT** SEALED AMENDED MOTION in Limine Regarding Apportionment of 2003 Microsoft and Sun Agreements filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. -- moot+denied 410 Plaintiff's MOTION for Entry of Judgment PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 54(b) filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. -- denied --- Looks like a bench trial. The only good news for SCOX is that it can introduce new evidence or argument on the nature of the licenses. --------- IBM http://www.zensden.net/Documents/SCO-v-IBM IBM's dockets have been quiet all week but theres always politics about which to squeak! ---------- -- TWZ |
|||||||
| Ratings | ||
|---|---|---|
| Yay | Nay | No comment |
| ColonelZen | ||